Kos rightly attacks Hillary Clinton for refusing to "say, unambiguously, that she agrees with 80-year-old Republican Senator John Warner that no, [gays] are not "'immoral.'"
I don't really understand her political motive for taking this approach. Is she genuinely conflicted on the issue? Or is she banking on getting some of that coveted "anti-gay" vote? Neither answer is very flattering for Clinton, that's for sure.
