Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

10/18/11

Democrats and the Death of Keynesian Economics

Originally published at Truthout. '

It is quite remarkable, given the nature of the recent debate overeconomic policy in Washington, that a Wikipedia articles exists today called, "2008-2009 Keynesian resurgence." Today, both political parties have had an obsession with "austerity measures" for at least last year or so - which includes putting Medicare andSocial Security on the chopping block. Barack Obama's weak job bill, which was dead on arrival, only further demonstrates how twisted priorities are in Washington. So, it is actually hard to believe that, in the aftermath of the near-collapse of the economy in 2008, Maynard Keynes, who advocated government intervention in the economy to increase demand during downturns, was making a comeback.

But for a brief moment in time, this was indeed the case. After the 2008 bailout of Bear Stearns, Martin Wolf, an economics writer for the Financial Times and normally a staunch supporter of free-market globalization, wrote: "Remember March 14 2008: it was the day the dream of global free market capitalism died." In the same article, he quoted Joseph Ackerman, the chief executive of Deutsche Bank, saying: "I no longer believe in the market's self-healing power." In an October 10 article, The Washington Post - in all seriousness - suggested that the current economic crises meant the "The End Of American Capitalism" as we know it. The cover of Time magazine in February 2009, said, "We are all Socialists Now," referencing the need for government intervention to save us from the ills of capitalism. "Whether we want to admit it or not," the article observed, "the America of 2009 is moving toward a modern European state."

As frightening and tragic as the economic crisis of 2008 was, having these widely held doctrinal assumptions about the power of the so-called "free market" spun on their head did provide some hope. Maybe there could be some sort of shift toward a more humane mixed economy that reined in the horrific excesses of contemporary capitalism. The country was optimistic; a new president had just been elected and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, famously said that he "never wanted a serious crisis to go to waste." The Nation magazine even called for a "New New Deal."

What followed, unfortunately, was a very underwhelming flirtation with Keynesian policies (such as the too-small stimulus bill in 2009), which was then swiftly overwhelmed with bipartisan discussions about how to gut government spending and create on austerity movement. This occurred despite the fact that the need for Keynesian economic policies are just as great now, in the face of crippling unemployment, as they were in 2008-09.

Read the rest here.

8/7/07

The AFL-CIO Debate (In Progress) II: Obama and Foreign Policy

Obama looks awful, and foreign policy is killing him. I think the Obama campaign has made a huge miscalculation on foreign policy. The main attraction that Obama has towards anti-war lefties like myself was that he was right about the war in 2002. Since Edwards has outflanked Obama from the left (by a long shot) on economic issues, Obama's best chance to be the "anti-Hillary" candidate would have been to stay to the left of Edward's on issues of war and peace.

Instead, his campaign has decided that his previous foresight about Iraq has enabled him to go insanely hawkish towards Afghanistan and Pakistan (see his disturbing piece in Foreign Affairs for more on this). Sounding like a true advocate of the perpetual War on Terror, he is running a frighteningly interventionist campaign, and as I have noted before, he has garnered the praise of Marty Peretz on the Middle East, and Robert Kagan on international policy in general. He also caved to Bush on funding and receives a lot of funding from defense contractors. In short, the one issue that should have made Obama appealing to me, has become his biggest weakness.